Gun Control in the USA

Introduction – What we are going to do is politically go over the troubles related to gun control.

Does Gun Control Cut down Crime? – Emphatically no. Never ever when did it ever do that.

Below are many research that can be researched on the Web your self that document the fact that gun control by no means reduces crime.

New Jersey – In 1996 New Jersey passed what was considered to be the most stringent gun laws in the USA. Two years later their murder rate went up 46% and their robbery rate about doubled.

Hawaii – In 1968 Hawaii passed harsh gun laws. At the time of the legislation their murder rate was 2.4 per 100,000 per year. Nine years later their murder rate had tripled to 7.two per 100,000.

Washington, D.C. – In 1976 they passed a key gun control law. They even stopped consumers from owning guns in their properties. Their murder rate went up 134% whilst the USA rate for murder dropped 2%.

New York City – They have some of the most restrictive gun manage laws in the globe. All sales of any sort of gun are restricted and tightly controlled. 20% of all armed robberies in the USA are committed in New York City and they do not have anywhere close to 20% of the population. This is what takes place when the criminals know a certain population is unlikely to be unable to defend themselves.

Chicago, New York City, Detroit and Washington, D.C.- Each of these cities has accomplished a virtual ban on the private ownership of guns. The Washington D.C laws are becoming fought out in the appellate courts at present. These four cities have 20% of the homicides in the USA but they only make up 6% of the USA population. This signifies that restrictive gun control leads to a tripling of the homicide rate. Some one is going to say wait the population in these areas is why the murder rate is so high. Fine we can appear at Arlington, Virginia which is a city proper across the Potomac River from Washington D.C with sensible gun manage laws so the population base will need to not be that numerous. Their murder rate is ten% of Washington D.C. (7. murders per 100,000 folks versus 77.8 murders per 100,000 many people in Washington D.C). We can also look to Virginia Beach, Va. a nearby city of 400,000. They have sensible gun laws allowing for simple access to firearms and their murder rate is four.1 per 100,000.

Other Effects Non-Restrictive Gun Laws have on Crime – In the USA in a given year law abiding citizens kills two,000 to three,000 criminals. They also wound an additional 9,000 to 17,000 criminals a year. This is a reduction in the load of violent crimes the government ought to arrest, detain, prosecute and imprison. It also sends a robust signal to the other would be criminals. Criminals worry far way more about an encounter with an armed law abiding citizen than a policeman. Police are most most likely going to be polite about asking the criminal to drop their weapon and submit. The citizen in fear of guarding himself and his household is going to be a lot a lot more prone to firing his weapon than a police officer. Criminals’ greatest worry is operating into an armed victim when committing a crime. This was based on a study of 1874 felons from ten states. In this study 38% of these felons mentioned at least one time they had been scared off, shot at or wounded by an armed victim. Only 1% of the time do criminals take a gun away from a victim, however ten% of the police officers that are shot, are shot with their personal guns. Police officers are slow to shoot and the criminals know this and thus are much more fearful of an armed citizen. Private citizens kill three times as a great number of criminals as police do. Remember if a person is assaulting you or robbing you or your house the police will most likely only be taking a report not encountering the criminals. It is the citizen who requirements all the help and help of weapons to survive the criminal encounter.

Why Do Governments Seek Gun Control? – Worry! They are afraid of losing control over the population. The prefect state of affairs for a police state is the confiscation of all privately owned firearms. Then the possibility of an overthrow of the government goes down by about 99.9%. They never ever want partial gun controls like only machine guns or “assault type weapons” to be banned. They want all the privately owned guns gone. The partial gun control is the Salami theory. You keep cutting a slice away until there is nothing at all left. The only cause for gun control is to make space for a totalitarian government, absolutely nothing else. Sometime there are folks ignorantly confused who help gun control thinking it will do something to make the globe a safer location to live. Play with these people and say when the government disarms then you will. Tell them to chase the government and tell them to have the government give up their guns for police leaving only the military armed. Use the British Bobbies who utilised to be unarmed as an example. Tell them the Cayman Island and Nassau police are unarmed. Have them call for the disarming of the police. Play with them. Have enjoyable. Just about every time the police shoot a person accidentally tell them to call for the disarming of the police.

How Would Gun Manage Occur – Well Obama showed it to you lately. They had been beginning to introduce gun manage bills once again. We do not know how aggressively they will push them this time. Nothing at all in these bills will do any practical good in terms of decreasing crime, not a single thing. They also improve the penalties every single time. So if it would happen what would it appear like. OK there would be a bill that say banned all assault weapons. The bill would say the attorney General can add any gun to the list he wanted. Over time he would preserve adding guns to test the public response. The banned guns would be prohibited from becoming sold at 1st. They would leave .22 caliber single shot rifles and single shot shotguns till the finish to satisfy the call for hunting guns. Then the banned guns would come to be illegal to own even if they had been grandfathered in, registered whatever. This would be some thing like turn them in or face 20 years in prison for every gun plus a $100,000 fine for each gun. I am serious on the penalties.

No one particular would be coming to anyone’s residence to collect the guns for a extended time. They would wait for somebody to get shot with a .22 caliber gun and then say these too will need to be banned. They consistently appreciate to call for new restrictive laws after a shooting crime. Do that back to them. Every time you see the police abuse a individual with a taser call for them to be banned and not utilised by the police. They will soon cease when their own tactics gets turned on them. Now the consumers have their guns and they can run about quoting Charleston Heston and his out of my cold dead hands slogan. The next stage is anytime the nearby police get into a residence like to respond to a burglary, a domestic abuse call, a noisy party something and they see the guns then someone gets to go to jail for a lengthy time. The word soon gets out. If you consider the people that personal guns are going to like get together, carry guns and march on Washington D.C. armed to the teeth to demand gun laws be repealed you will need to get some counseling. You will in no way see this. If something like this were ever going to take place it would have happened in 1968 with the very first critical federal gun control law. This came on the heels of the Kennedy assassination. What did that have to do with gun manage laws anyway?